Providing Strong Defence Strategies in Sydney, NS.
When faced with a legal matter, it’s important to be in good hands. Michel Desneiges will lead you through the process in a personalised way.
When you choose to work with Michel DesNeiges, he will carefully investigate your case and build a strong defence strategy. During your legal proceedings he will help you understand the process and discuss your options, helping you make informed decisions. As a trial litigator, he will fight so that you receive a fair trial, challenge any evidence that is illegally obtained, and make certain that your case is presented as strongly as possible.
Legal services at a competitive rate
If you’re in the Sydney, NS area and need a criminal defence lawyer or family lawyer, request a free case evaluation below.
Facts: Client charged with sexual assault. Accused of fondling a young woman while she slept during a sleepover at her friend's house.
Outcome: Charge withdrawn after preliminary inquiry
Reasons: At the preliminary inquiry, the complainant admitted on cross examination that she did not like the accused because he teased her earlier in the evening. And, she admitted she was not able to completely identify the male who touched her because it was dark in the room and other males were present during the sleepover. The prosecution determined that there was no reasonable prospect of a conviction at trial based on those factors, among others.
Facts: Client charged with armed robbery. Client accused of being the shooter of a pellet gun while 2nd male stole Complainant's bike. Client identified by Complainant in photo lineup which was done 4 months after the incident.
Verdict: Not guilty
Reasons: Complainant's identification not reliable. Complainant admitted on cross-examination that he told the 911 operator that the shooter was someone else. Complainant also admitted that he provided a description of the shooter to the police that did not fit Client's profile. And, judge found that the photo line-up identification was unreliable because too vague.
Facts: Client charged with criminal harassment. Client accused of stalking and intimidating her ex-boyfriend by driving by him at various locations in the community.
Verdict: Not guilty
Reasons: Complainant not credible. Complainant annoyed mostly by Client’s rude gestures.